Most governments in the world are faced with
numerous socio-economic constraints that threaten to destabilize them. It may
not be the case with such states just collapsing as time goes by, rather, the
principle cause of state failure is religion (Van
der Veer, 1994). This paper discusses three areas that show the presence
of religion, and role it plays to ensure nations come crashing down.
First, developing economies find it hard to provide
essential public goods such as education, security, water, and health care to
its people. This creates channel through which religion, by providing these
services, earns its place in the society (Van
der Veer, 1994). This is because religious groups, mostly characterized
with the ability to work in gang-like structures, enjoy support from a majority
of population (Lee, 2010). For instance,
the Egyptian religious group Muslim Brotherhood worked with civilians to earn
their trust. As time would have it, they later on led an uprising which toppled
an economy that had once been a regional economic powerhouse.
Secondly, weaker economies are incapable of earning
a religious autonomy when it comes to decision making. Rather conservative
religions will always be against packages related to westernization,
civilization, secular bills of rights, development, and capitalism (Lee, 2010). In such cases, religious
terrorism grows to breed self proclaimed martyrs who threaten economic
stability thus rows (Van der Veer, 1994).
World notable groups known for religious terrorism include Al-Qaeda; the
Japanese Aum Shinrikyo; Somali Al-Shaabab; and the Christian identity movement
opposition on abortion in the US.
Lastly, most emerging countries are breeding grounds
for impenetrable religions enjoying god-like treatments from the religious
majority. As most would say, the church
is always right, group leaders and their followers display a typical “do as I
say or I hurt you” attitude. Additionally, political leaders get elected based
on their religious background. Since different religious fronts are always in
conflict, they try to outwit each other, by so creating radical groups capable
of fighting the state (Van der Veer, 1994).
References
Lee,
R. D. (2010). Religion and Politics in the Middle East: Identity, Ideology,
Institutions, and Attitudes. Boulder,
CO: Westview Press.
Van der Veer, P. (1994). Religious Nationalism: Hindus and
Muslims in India. Berkeley: University of California
Press.
LIONEL SAVAGE INZAHULI
No comments:
Post a Comment